Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Is xsl:for-each "syntactic sugar"? From: Kendall Shaw <kshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 17:04:57 -0700 |
Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 18:34 -0400, Costello, Roger L. wrote: > Yes, I agree hat you believe that. If I found a hat that agrees with me, it would be believe anything. "Costello, Roger L." <costello@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > ---------------------------------------------- > IMPLEMENTATION #1: Uses Recursive Function > ---------------------------------------------- ... > <xsl:function name="ex:Balance"> ... > </xsl:function> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > IMPLEMENTATION #2: Uses xsl:apply-templates to Recursively Fire a Template > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... > <xsl:template match="Transaction"> ... > </xsl:template> I don't follow what distinction you are making between the 2 implementations. They both have essentially the same structure. Maybe you are discussing the idea that you can't accumulate a value using reassignment in a loop in a functional language. Then there the distinction between a functional call (or using call-template) and using apply-templates. But, this doesn't seem to be about push vs. pull processing. Kendall
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Is xsl:for-each "synt, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Is xsl:for-each "synt, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] RE: Is xsl:for-each "synt, Liam R E Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] Is xsl:for-each "syntacti, Mukul Gandhi |
Month |