Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Peter Desjardins convert HTML to DITA From: Peter Desjardins <peter.desjardins.us@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 12:07:32 -0400 |
Hi. Thanks for pointing this out. I tried using h2d.xsl a few weeks ago and found that it didn't work very well for my content. I wondered whether it would be more work to clean up the original HTML and adjust the IBM stylesheet or to write my own stylesheet. I want to have fine control over the output XML and the option of converting to DocBook. I also want to expand my grasp of XSLT. These have all let me to try to create my own. Peter On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Hoskins & Gretton <hoskgret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > HI, I have adapted the files from IBM for this type of work. See > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-dita8a/ > There were a few problems that I had to fix to get it to run. You may need > to use Tidy on the files first, and set the output to xml, rather than > xhtml, I think. It's been a while since I did it. > The h2d.xsl for conversion to DITA is a v1.1 styelsheet, with Saxon > extensions > <xsl:stylesheet version="1.1" > xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > xmlns:saxon="http://icl.com/saxon" > extension-element-prefixes="saxon"> > You would have to analyze how to rewrite more efficiently in v2.0. If you > did it successfully, you might be doing the DITA world a kindness by sharing > your conversion. > Regards, Dorothy
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Re: Peter Desjardins convert , Hoskins & Gretton | Thread | [xsl] generate-id() explanation, a kusa |
Re: [xsl] Grouping a sequence of el, Peter Desjardins | Date | Re: [xsl] Two recommendations: (1) , Wendell Piez |
Month |