Subject: Re: [xsl] generic grouping without nesting for-each-group? From: James Cummings <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:47:26 +0100 |
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:29, Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> wrote: > It has become rather complicated with two functions due to the requirement > to add missing levels. It hadn't actually occurred to me to do the recursion in a function rather than a named template. Fun! > Your latest suggestion to first normalize the input by adding missing levels > and then to group in a second pass might indeed be an approach leading to > shorter and less complicated code. So far not thought of a better suggestion... though I have a natural suspicion of adding in phantom structure in any case. -James
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] generic grouping without , Martin Honnen | Thread | [xsl] fo:simple-page-master related, Red Light |
[xsl] Wrong encoding value: "Conten, Ben Stover | Date | Re: [xsl] Wrong encoding value: "Co, David Carlisle |
Month |