Subject: [xsl] Where in the XPath 2.0 is the text stating that a function can be used as the location step? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:11:26 -0700 |
I can see from the productions of the XPAth 2.0 grammar that: A StepExpr can be a FilterExpr (27) and A FilterExpr can be PrimaryExpr (38) and A PrimaryExpr can be FunctionCall (41) However I cant see anywhere a description in natural language that a step can be a function call, and I think it is important that this fact be stated clearly enough. Am I missing this text? -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- I enjoy the massacre of ads. This sentence will slaughter ads without a messy bloodbath.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Where in the XPath 2.0 is, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] ancestor::* and for-each, Martin Honnen | Date | Re: [xsl] Help with transforming un, Jack Bush |
Month |