Subject: Re: [xsl] Asynchronous transformation in a (Java) Web app From: Greg Hunt <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:22:44 +1000 |
Why would you pick the more approach that requires more infrastructure? On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Ludwig, Michael <Michael.Ludwig@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ...snip... > > A simple thread has worked for me, but JMS is more advanced. > I'd go the JMS way now. > -- > Michael Ludwig
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Asynchronous transformati, Ludwig, Michael | Thread | RE: [xsl] Asynchronous transformati, Ludwig, Michael |
RE: [xsl] Asynchronous transformati, Ludwig, Michael | Date | RE: [xsl] Asynchronous transformati, Ludwig, Michael |
Month |