Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equivalent in xslt

Subject: Re: [xsl] Need StringBuffer equivalent in xslt
From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:05:17 +0100
If you want two separate results you simply process the input twice.


Sometimes of course this means repeating work. Sometimes the optimizer can eliminate the repeated work for you; sometimes you can eliminate it yourself by using variables to hold the intermediate results of a computation. Taken further, this leads to pipeline architecture in which you put your data through a series of transformation steps composed in series or in parallel.


Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread