Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?

[Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx>]

 I'd guess this is due to XSLT 2.0 achieving more by less lines.

On 31 October 2010 10:51, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> It would be interesting to learn about some industry data, such as the
number of
>> lines of code resulting from and/or person years spent on a single
>> XSLT project.
>>
>
> You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The
numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for 1.0,
which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to large-scale
programming.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica