Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes From: Andriy Gerasika <andriy.gerasika@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:16:26 +0200 |
why is -9 good practice rather that -188 or -123.456, or, as in the posted code, -0.5 ? what is so special about -9 that you say it _should_ be used?
> > Saxon will say Recoverable Error if two template match the same node.
sorry, I thought <xsl:template match="@*|node()"> and <xsl:template match="*[not(node())]" /> have the same default priority
But there was no other templates of the same priority in the supplied code.
David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Brandon Ibach |
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] Retrieving Complete XPATH fro, Ramkumar.V |
Month |