Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively eliminate empty nodes From: Evan Lenz <evan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:10:10 -0800 |
At 2010-11-12 23:18 -0800, Evan Lenz wrote:I think that paragraph serves a more explanatory than normative role. The algorithm described above it (in the bulleted list) does not include "/" as having a default priority of -0.5. Therefore it must be +0.5.
I just noticed (from here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#dt-default-priority) that in XSLT 2.0, "/" has priority -0.5, whereas it has +0.5 in XSLT 1.0.
That's not my read from:
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116#conflict "Patterns less specific than this (patterns that just tests for nodes with particular types) have priority -0.5.
Evan -- Evan Lenz Lenz Consulting Group, Inc. http://lenzconsulting.com +1 (360) 297-0087
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSLT 1.0] Q: recursively, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] replacing of characters b, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] replacing of characters b, ram |
Month |