Subject: Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces From: ac <ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:30:56 -0400 |
Regards, Andre
Hi Brandon,
Languages and communications, like all beings and things, are not perfect. The best that we can do is find errors and try better approximations. I thank you for finding these errors and focusing me for a better approximation.
Regards,
Andre
I think Andrew was just clarifying that it was you who said "I have stylesheets that use in excess of 80 namespaces...", since the way it was quoted seemed to inadvertently suggest that Andrew said it. The following "I don't think I've ever had more than 8 namespaces in a single stylesheet" was Andrew's own statement, offered in contrast to the statement for which he appeared to have been credited.
And people complain that reading and understanding other people's code (XSLT or otherwise) is too hard! At least there's a widely-agreed-upon specification for the meaning of that (most of it, anyway) and limits on the syntax, unlike natural languages. ;)
-Brandon :)
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 12:45 AM, ac<ac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Andrew, I have not found that quote from the archives and I am curious as to
what was the context and what could my mistake have been, or just how long
ago was that?
On 15 April 2011 09:37, Michael Kay<mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 15/04/2011 09:31, Andrew Welch wrote:Ouch. Perhaps I need to start revising my assumption that the number ofI have stylesheets that use in excess of 80 namepaces, for various purposes.
in-scope namespaces will always be small enough to make a linear search
acceptable.Just for the archives it was 'ac' that said that.... I don't think I've ever had more than 8 namespaces in a single stylesheet.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Na, ac | Thread | Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Na, Liam R E Quin |
[xsl] XQuery - Two if's in a for lo, sudheshna iyer | Date | Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Na, Liam R E Quin |
Month |