Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template

Subject: Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template
From: Stefan Hunziker <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:46:56 +0200
ok, you're right. I know that there are other XSLT processors for .net
but this is a matter of money: a XQSharp redistribution licence is at
GBP4500 per year and Saxon even more. So at the moment this isn't
really an option for us and I'd better say "I'm forced to use
Microsoft"...
Stefan

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 16:45, Stefan Hunziker wrote:
>>
>>  That
>> XSLT 2 (or even 3) would give me easier and cleaner solutions is quite
>> clear, hope Microsoft will notice that once (I'm forced to use
>> .net..)!
>>
> Being forced to use .NET isn't the same as being forced to use Microsoft.
> There are at least two non-Microsoft XSLT 2.0 processors that run on .NET.
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
>
>



--
****************************
stefan hunziker
kanalweg 10
ch-3315 bdtterkinden

tel +41 32 665 17 76
mob +41 79 455 30 62

email stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Current Thread