Subject: Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to template From: Stefan Hunziker <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 07:46:56 +0200 |
ok, you're right. I know that there are other XSLT processors for .net but this is a matter of money: a XQSharp redistribution licence is at GBP4500 per year and Saxon even more. So at the moment this isn't really an option for us and I'd better say "I'm forced to use Microsoft"... Stefan On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 09/06/2011 16:45, Stefan Hunziker wrote: >> >> That >> XSLT 2 (or even 3) would give me easier and cleaner solutions is quite >> clear, hope Microsoft will notice that once (I'm forced to use >> .net..)! >> > Being forced to use .NET isn't the same as being forced to use Microsoft. > There are at least two non-Microsoft XSLT 2.0 processors that run on .NET. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > > -- **************************** stefan hunziker kanalweg 10 ch-3315 bdtterkinden tel +41 32 665 17 76 mob +41 79 455 30 62 email stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Stefan Hunziker |
Re: [xsl] passing filtered tree to , Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] reproducing the hierarchical , trubliphone |
Month |