Subject: Re: [xsl] XML pretty printer From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:01:58 -0500 |
XML is text, so strictly speaking, it wouldn't be a lie. Cheers, E. On 9/27/11 10:59 PM, "Liam R E Quin" <liam@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 04:39 -0700, John Christopher wrote: > >> My data only contains elements with attributes >> and no CDATA or PCDATA. > > Well, you have CDATA in your attribute values, strictly speaking :-) but > I think you mean no element content. > > (I hope you don't plan to localise this to Japanese!) > >> If my data *did* contain CDATA or PCDATA, the >> formatter should leave the data alone, but >> properly indent the surrounding tags. > > I think an example was already posted that will probaly do what you > need; if not, it's a case of modifying the "identity transform" to treat > the attributes specially. You will need to lie and say you are > generating text, not XML, of course. > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ > -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.reallysi.com www.rsuitecms.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XML pretty printer, Liam R E Quin | Thread | [xsl] RE: XSL-FL Basic-link results, Sharon Harris |
Re: [xsl] XML pretty printer, Liam R E Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath that returns nothin, Vasu Chakkera |
Month |