Subject: Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = () From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:28:32 +0100 |
>> If () = () is false, then it's intuitive (to me) that deep-equal((), >> ()) is also false. The one liner saying that it should be true just >> seems like it could easily say false. > > No, that would be wrong/confusing. deep-equal returns true because the > sequences are the same, = returns false because no items in either sequence > are equal. To parapharse: The sequences are the *same*, but no items in either sequence are equal. Ok, that takes a little pondering, but I can get that. So, now that () and () are the same, why does () eq () not return true? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), G. Ken Holman |
Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), Markus Abt | Date | Re: [xsl] () eq () vs () = (), G. Ken Holman |
Month |