Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT Patterns From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 23:05:55 +0100 |
> XSLTers don't seem to have drunk the pattern kool-aid to the extent that > Java and, it now seems, C++ programmers have, though I did get a similar > question about XSL-FO patterns a week or so ago at my XML Summer School > session on XSLT and XSL-FO. > > 13-or-so years of XSL-List hasn't crystallised into a set of standard > patterns AFAICT (and Meunchian grouping for XSLT 1.0 was probably the > closest we came to a standard pattern). A few spring to mind - the identity transform, sibling recursion, specific-imports-common, micro-pipelining etc. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT Patterns, Tony Graham | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT Patterns, David Mitchell |
Re: [xsl] XSLT Patterns, Tony Graham | Date | Re: [xsl] Providing a value for the, Mark |
Month |