Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decision: Sanity Check From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:26:02 -0400 |
Cheers, Wendell
Eliot Kimber [mailto:ekimber@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:I would tend to lean toward Schematron on the principle of separation of concerns, where the ownership of the rules for the data validation is likely different from the implementation of the transformation rules.
A very useful point. Thanks, Eliot--and for your comments about .NET.
Norm
-- ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decisi, Norm Birkett | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decisi, Philip Fearon |
Re: [xsl] XML to XML change, handli, Ruud Grosmann | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Schematron Decisi, Philip Fearon |
Month |