Subject: Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using Filter From: Lighton Phiri <lighton.phiri@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:34:54 +0200 |
Thanks all the the valuable feedback. The count approach suggested by Andrew& Brandon did the trick :) --count(preceding-sibling::*) Awesome! just so you know, I forgot an important detail --I am working with xslt 1.0 and so "index-of and " and the book[tokenize(., '/')[last()] eq $bpage] hint wont work. Lighton Phiri http://lightonphiri.org/ @lightonphiri On 28 October 2011 21:01, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex <gerrit.imsieke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 2011-10-28 20:17, Liam R E Quin wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 10:27 -0400, Murray McDonald wrote: >>> >>> If you are sure that there will be one and only one "match" then the >>> '[1]' >>> is unnecessary >>> >>> index-of(//book, //book[ends-with(., 'ASTRO_00007.JPG')])[1] >> >> On the other hand, the difference between /a/b/c[1] and (/a/b/c)[1] is a >> major source of confusion for the newcomer and the "perpetual >> intermediate" [1] alike. > > Thanks for confusing the perpetual intermediate with a [1] that looks like a > positional predicate but that actually is a citation link. Pun intended? > >> >> Sometimes you have to make the computer work a little harder if it means >> getting the right answer more often. > > Agree [+1].
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Thread | Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Vasu Chakkera |
Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [xsl] Position() Function Using, Vasu Chakkera |
Month |