Subject: Re: [xsl] can a value of a parameter depends on a other value From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:58:14 +0000 |
On 02/12/2011 11:34, Roelof Wobben wrote: > > I made a quick draft of the idea I have to solve my problem and you > can see I need all those variables Well, you've got rid of all the parameter passing, which is the main simplification that I mentioned. As for the variables, as I said earlier, it's mainly a matter if taste. There are rather few occasions when using a side effect free programming style that you _need_ variables. If you only use them a few times, it's often just as simple to use the expressions inline, but if you find that it simplifies things for you then it's OK to use them of course. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] can a value of a paramete, Roelof Wobben | Thread | RE: [xsl] can a value of a paramete, Roelof Wobben |
Re: [xsl] XPath equivalence questio, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra | Date | RE: [xsl] can a value of a paramete, Roelof Wobben |
Month |