Subject: [xsl] Re: Safe Upgrade to XSLT 2.0 From: Hans-Juergen Rennau <hrennau@xxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 08:52:24 +0000 (GMT) |
Hello Bram, three proposals come to mind. If you insist on reliability, consider using the Saxon; if performance is an issue, I suppose the Saxon would be a good choice; if you insist on conformance to the spec, I would recommend the Saxon. Things get more complicated, however, if the Java API must be mature (contrary to the JAXP APIs...), supporting, for example, the XDM data model, thread safety and the integration of Java extension functions. If so, I would resort to the Saxon. Kind regards, Hans-Juergen >>> Hello, In our organisation we develop an webapplication based on XSLT and Java. The xslt part of de application is my responsibility. We are using xslt1.0 with xalan-J as the xslt processor. Java version is 6. It's my wish to upgrade to xslt2.0, so the first part is find an alternative for the xslt1.0 processor xalan-J. One of the big issues is the performance of the processor. What suggestions are there for a xslt2.0 processor for a Java environment. Regards Bram <<<
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] finding and removing dupl, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] Dealing mixed content with in, Karlmarx R |
Re: [xsl] finding and removing dupl, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] Dealing mixed content with in, Karlmarx R |
Month |