Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSL-FO] Way to include an outside stylesheet? From: Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:46:51 +0000 (GMT) |
Wendell Piez wrote: Hi, > "XSL", in fact, properly means the combination of XSLT and > XSL-FO, even if it's also commonly used to mean XSLT without > XSL-FO. Even worse... Some people use it to refer to XSLT (like an "abbreviation" of XSLT, mainly because of the usual extension .xsl I guess). Some people use it to refer to XSL-FO, as the XSL spec actually refers to the XSLT spec, but includes (and is) the spec body for XSL-FO. And I guess some people use it to refer to XSL, but I rarely have the opportunity to speak about XSL as a whole ;-) My rule of thumb: always use either XSLT or XSL-FO, and if you hear XSL, ask for precision. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] [XSL-FO] Way to include a, David Lee | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSL-FO] Way to include a, G. Ken Holman |
RE: [xsl] [XSL-FO] Way to include a, David Lee | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSL-FO] Way to include a, G. Ken Holman |
Month |