Subject: Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster? From: TW <zupftom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:21:37 +0100 |
Thanks to all for your advice. That helps deciding what to use in what situation. Thomas W. 2012/2/9 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I like pure XPath solutions because they are less verbose, but I find >> "full" XSLT less restricting and easier to debug (especially when I >> want to check what variable holds what value). > > ...and insert additional instructions like xsl:message or comments, or > allow refactorings at certain points like an apply-templates instead > of just getting the value. > > My general guide is use XPath for simple tasks, say an if-then-else, > but when its get past trivial, eg if-then-else-if-then-else, switch to > the longer winded choose/when, as your future self with thank you for > it. > > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] Comparing numbers with di, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Comparing numbers with di, David Carlisle |
Month |