Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors From: Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:14:19 -0500 |
Cheers, Wendell
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 12:34 +0000, Michael Kay wrote:[...]
Perhaps Steve BallThis posting sort of sums it up:found something else to do with his weekends. I think the days of hobbyist implementations of these technologies are past.
http://mail.explain.com.au/pipermail/libx/2011-September/000004.html
Large open source projects generally need a community, or someone with a lot of wisdom and generosity and dedication and focus, or (best) both. I agree 100%.
On the other hand, a C (not C++) implementation would bring XSLT 2 a lot closer to PHP, Python, Perl, JavaScript, etc. Or maybe even a translation into XQuery, hmmm...
-- ====================================================================== Wendell Piez mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Liam R E Quin | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Michael Kay |
Month |