Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors
From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 19:59:36 +0000

> What are the strong areas for XML that look like they will remain? Even
> Douglas Crockford (main promoter of JSON) says that XML is better for
> documents than JSON. What else? XML databases?

Nooooo not xml vs json....  :)   There are plenty of opinions in the
various archives if you wanted to go over that old ground.

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, (continued) Martin Honnen - 9 Feb 2012 13:29:09 -0000 Mark Giffin - 9 Feb 2012 17:20:06 -0000 Andrew Welch - 9 Feb 2012 18:14:54 -0000 Mark Giffin - 9 Feb 2012 19:48:28 -0000 Andrew Welch - 9 Feb 2012 19:59:45 -0000 <= Mark Giffin - 9 Feb 2012 20:53:25 -0000 Andrew Welch - 9 Feb 2012 23:22:53 -0000 Wendell Piez - 10 Feb 2012 17:19:48 -0000 Michael Kay - 9 Feb 2012 23:37:38 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Mark Giffin	Thread	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Mark Giffin
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Mark Giffin	Date	Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Mark Giffin
	Month