Subject: Re: [xsl] faster complicated counting From: Syd Bauman <Syd_Bauman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 09:14:45 -0500 |
Thank you *so* much to Alex, Liam, Wendell, Emmanuel, Wolfgang, and David (off-list) for your replies. I am sure one of these suggestions will do the trick. AM> I wonder if [this] is really worth the memory AM> given the logic to count it couldn't not be that intensive. AM> ... Is the memory used to determine this worth the time it takes AM> to calculate this information on the fly, what the reason for AM> storing these numbers in your xml? Ha! Excellent questions. In truth, my original desire was to calculate them on the fly. But the counting algorithm I came up with (i.e., the one I posted, and the one I hope to improve with all these suggestions) was *so* slow I had to switch to decorating the tree ahead of delivery time just so that these numbers don't have to be calculated on the fly. If I get to the point where calculating all the line numbers needed for a book of poetry is measured in fractions of a second instead of in minutes, I'll go back to calculating on the fly.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] faster complicated counti, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | Re: [xsl] faster complicated counti, Syd Bauman |
Re: [xsl] faster complicated counti, Wolfgang Laun | Date | Re: [xsl] faster complicated counti, Syd Bauman |
Month |