Subject: RE: [xsl] Help parsing a node|
From: Michele R Combs <mrrothen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:47:31 +0000
Yes, I thought that was odd too -- would much prefer to have it grab the first occurrence, seems more logical. When/if I sort out the answer, I'll switch it to that as part of my fix. I did look at the for-each but only quickly; I'll go back and take a deeper look. Thanks -- Michele -----Original Message----- From: Wendell Piez [mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 4:39 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Help parsing a node ...This means it is the last of its type, while the more conventional thing (and what Martin provided) includes each container that is the first of its type. Look in your for-each and see whether that might be affecting things...