Subject: Re: [xsl] Why are there no XSLT processors implemented in XSLT? From: Markus Abt <abt@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 18:41:18 +0200 |
Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt wrote: > Same output (at bottom, besides XML-declaration). > Did run this on a 2.2GHz i7 processor, while naxos.xsl was running java > process had between 160% and 224% CPU utilization, which is reflected in > real vs user time. Promising! Using enough cores, naxos will be faster than saxon. Sorry, Mr Kay. > As next step I wanted to see, whether naxos.xsl can run naxos.xsl ... :-) > But I got stopped at this very littly sample, further efforts seem > worthless: [...] > <xsl:copy-of select="."/> According to the documentation, copy-of is not yet implemented. But naxos doesn't make use of copy-of !? $ grep "<[^:]*:copy-of" naxos/*.xsl | wc -l 0 Best regards, Markus
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Why are there no XSLT pro, Alan Painter | Thread | Re: [xsl] Why are there no XSLT pro, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra |
Re: [xsl] Why are there no XSLT pro, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Why are there no XSLT pro, Hermann Stamm-Wilbra |
Month |