Subject: RE: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draft From: Michele R Combs <mrrothen@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:17:04 +0000 |
Heh. You're quite right. Congratulations and yay for the new features, especially the accumulators and catch-ability :) I guess I was thinking of for example browsers being able to handle 2.0 features (which I don't think any can, can they?), but you're right of course, lots of people are using it internally. Michele suitably chastened -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 2:14 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draft On 10/07/2012 19:01, Michele R Combs wrote: such a spoilsport:-) the correct response is "congratulations" or "interesting new features"! or something:-) > Since relatively few folks adopted 2.0 How did you measure that? certainly almost all the traffic here has been xslt2 for years. (One of the shocks of looking at the xslt questions on stackoverflow where I look occasionally is that there is still there a tendency towards XSLT 1 use, which I found rather shocking really. Outside of a browser I'd not use xslt 1. > what do we think the chances are of 3.0 being adopted? Crystal balls required for that bit... David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draf, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draf, Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draf, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Template match priority, David Carlisle |
Month |