Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alone programming language From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:55:56 -0400 |
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 08:31 -0700, Dimitre Novatchev wrote: > As Liam noted, another good to have feature in XPath would be > namespace definition support and probably ways for defining the > initial context. I tried to get the XQuery and XSLT WGs interested in the idea of some sort of 'bind expression', e.g. use prefix h = "some uri", i = "some uri" in h:/hello/i:invisible but they went instead down the road of EQNames, which are easier for machine generation of paths but harder for humans writing paths. We don't often hear from people using XPath but not (XSLT|XQuery), even though it is obviously a frequent thing to do. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml Co-author, 5th edition of "Beginning XML", Wrox, Summer 2012
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alon, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alon, Dimitre Novatchev |
[xsl] Re: [xml-dev] XPath as a stan, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: XPath as a stand-alon, Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |