Subject: Re: [xsl] unparsed text From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:58:59 +0000 |
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I've been reading >> http://www.saxonica.com/papers/ideadb-1.1/mhk-paper.xml and wondering >> whether the signature for analyze-string is lifted from the Little >> Schemer (Ch 10). > > I've never read that so I think the answer is no. Of course, it could be the > other way around? > 1st edition goes back to 1989 so probably not. I think they show table lookups via a signature that allows you to supply item, table and procedures for the successful and unsuccessful case.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] unparsed text, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Replace(//text()) in XSLT 1, Nathan Tallman |
Re: [xsl] unparsed text, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] unparsed text, Andrew Welch |
Month |