Subject: Re: [xsl] A suggestion re <xsl:import> From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:38:32 +0000 |
Not got my eye on what is in the pipeline but I frequently run into scenarios where I would like to but cannot use xsl:import.
It would be nice to have a facility that replicated the semantics of xsl:import without the requirement for the imported code to be in a separate file - the intended use case is as above ( although it will probably get abused).
In principle the code doesn't _have_ to be in a separate file, it depends on the abilities of your URI resolver, for example you could use
But there are rather few cases where you can not replace a xsl:import by just directly including the templates in the current file, adjusting priorities and using xsl:next-match instead of xsl:apply-imports
Actually converting from one form to another is a bit tiresome but if you know that you want to keep things in ome file it is usually possible to write in a style using xsl;next-match more and xsl:apply-imports less.
________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] A suggestion re <xsl:import>, Ihe Onwuka | Thread | Re: [xsl] A suggestion re <xsl:impo, Ihe Onwuka |
[xsl] A suggestion re <xsl:import>, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] A suggestion re <xsl:impo, Ihe Onwuka |
Month |