Subject: Re: [xsl] better way to get the path to a node? From: Liam R E Quin <liam@xxxxxx> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 23:47:23 -0500 |
On Sat, 2012-12-01 at 21:08 -0500, Graydon wrote: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2012 at 06:50:12PM -0500, Liam R E Quin scripsit: [...] > > You might want to investigate using an XQuery implementation that > > builds an index to the documents - even if you just use it to generate > > temporary documents that you then use to help your XSLT > > transformations. > > Which is actually what I'm doing -- use BaseX to load the ~4.5 > GB of date I need to search, use XQuery to build a ~100 MB file of > locations and then use that file to search against when generating the > report. 100 MBytes is still a fairly large document to use with XSLT. > The search time seems to be roughly 30 seconds plus one second per > megabyte of "find stuff in here and check it" content. > > Dealing with "no, that isn't going in memory" volumes of XML has > certainly been a learning experience! Yes - people find the same thing with almost any data structure. On the other hand, adding more physical memory can be an effective way to make things go faster... Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] better way to get the pat, Graydon | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT-driven syntax highli, Philip Fearon |
Re: [xsl] better way to get the pat, Graydon | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT-driven syntax highli, Philip Fearon |
Month |