Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:21:09 +0000 |
Hi Folks,The next release of Saxon will, I hope, have complete coverage of the XPath 3.0 candidate recommendation. But full conformance with XSLT 3.0 is still some way off.
I only know of one fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor -- SAXON.
Yes, you're right, a lot of people are looking for a free lunch. I'm glad you've realised this, and will now devote the next three years of your life to feeding their hunger.
And it's not free.
Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?
I believe that it is important there be at least one free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor.
Here's why: The people I work with think along these lines...
Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Greg Hunt |
Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Costello, Roger L. | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there any free, fully, Greg Hunt |
Month |