Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2013 survey From: James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:55:40 +0100 |
Sorry Mike, I am sure there are a million ways I could get this wrong. Next time, happy to be supplied the questions and I will send out. J On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Oh dear. My response to almost any survey is to say "you're asking the wrong > questions". > > "Please rank the importance of each xslt version". > > You need to ask people how important it is to them or their employers, not > how important they think it is to the world in general. Otherwise they are > guessing the information you are trying to discover. > > You need to explain what you mean by "importance": it's about what the > impact/value is, or is likely to be, on some timescale. What timescale? > > And you need to distinguish "It is important to me that this technology > should be available" from "I don't think this technology will have much > effect on us because I don't think it will be available on the timescale in > which we need it". > > Michael Kay > Saxonica > > > > On 28/01/2013 09:52, James Fuller wrote: >> >> pls consider taking the XSLT 2013 survey >> >> http://jimfuller2011.polldaddy.com/s/xslt-2013
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2013 survey, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2013 survey, Adam Retter |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2013 survey, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT 2013 survey, Adam Retter |
Month |