Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0: Is it possible to do recursion in an anonymous function? From: Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:43:18 +0100 |
It may have made for better conversation to translate an/your implementation of the Y-combinator into the target language and highlight where and if it breaks down. On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Is it possible to do recursion in an anonymous function?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0: Is it possible, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | [xsl] Priorities of unionised patte, Ihe Onwuka |
[xsl] Priorities of unionised patte, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] Priorities of unionised p, Michael Kay |
Month |