|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Chrome/blink developers discussing removing XSLT support From: "Eric J. Bowman" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:23:16 -0600 |
"Tony Graham" wrote: > > There's obviously more than a little distance between those two > positions, but how would you positively influence them towards our > position? > After years of watching every issue I care about get decided the other way by the browser vendors, I'd have to say I doubt positive influence is possible on XSLT. If XSLT survives as a Web technology, it'll be as a plugin, a la Flash. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Feb/0060.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Feb/0075.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Feb/0077.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Feb/0089.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2013Feb/0104.html That's called "tilting at windmills," but props to anyone else who wants to try. -Eric
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Chrome/blink developers d, Tony Graham | Thread | [xsl] How to make auto row-spanned , Toshihiko Makita |
| Re: [xsl] Chrome/blink developers d, Tony Graham | Date | [xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin |
| Month |