Subject: Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data to xml From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 21:10:42 +0200 |
But perhaps this discussion should stay away from pin-point implementations of this and that and remain focussed on major qualities, such as the ones on which Liam has remarked. If a programming language has the graviational force of attracting a community to contribute and remain contributing: this is "true grit" ;-) -W On 30/06/2013, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 30/06/2013, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Maybe a little off-topic, but years ago I created in XSLT 2.0 a >> general LR-1 parser (run-time ) tool, that is table-directed. >> >> I hope that this could help conclude the discussion whether or not >> XSLT is good for string processing -- if one can easily develop a >> parser for any deterministic CF language (which is the case), then we >> have a firm, positive answer. >> > > If the parser (as they usually do) exercises a pass over the input > string: where is the intensive (!) text processing by which to judge > whatever? > > My idea of text processing is a little advanced, perhaps. What about a > full implementation of m4 ;-) ? > > Cheers > Wolfgang
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data t, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | |
Re: [xsl] Reflecting on: csv data t, Wolfgang Laun | Date | |
Month |