Subject: [xsl] Please Confirm that xsl:document instruction cannot have a document URI From: Eliot Kimber <ekimber@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 11:17:49 -0500 |
I tried to find an answer to this question but neither Google nor MarkMail revealed a definitive answer. I have code that constructs a document using <xsl:document> and then passes it to a 3rd-party function library that expects the input document to have a URI so that it can then resolve relative URI references. Based on my reading of the XSLT 2 spec and what I could find in my searches, it appears that there is no standard way to define a document URI for documents created using <xsl:document>. This seems like a bit of an oversight in the spec, so I wanted to get confirmation that my analysis is correct, that I cannot use <xsl:document> alone as input to functions that expect to get a non-null document-uri() value. Thanks, Eliot -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Arabic alphabetical lists, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Please Confirm that xsl:d, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Arabic alphabetical lists, Wolfgang Laun | Date | Re: [xsl] Please Confirm that xsl:d, David Carlisle |
Month |