Re: [xsl] A nice way to implement the ANDing of the comparison of pairs of items in a sequence?

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 2013-09-05 16:56 -0400, Michael Dykman wrote:
> Glad to see this issue at hand reolved so elegantly but if I might
> clarify one digressional point:
>
> DeMorgan's Law: is not
>   "AND" is the same as "not( OR )"
> but rather
>  "AND" is the same as "not( NOR )"

Granted!  Thank you for the clarification.  Thus, what I was doing 
was correct for the requirement, but I shouldn't have labeled it DeMorgan's.

. . . . . . . . Ken

> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 4:24 PM, G. Ken Holman
> <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I think Michael wins this one!
> >
> >
> > . . . . . . Ken
> >
> > At 2013-09-05 21:06 +0100, Michael Kay wrote:
> >>
> >> How about
> >>
> >> deep-equal($v[position() mod 2 = 0], $v[position() mod 2 = 1])
> >>
> >> Michael Kay
> >> Saxonica
> >


--
Public XSLT, XSL-FO, and UBL classes in the Netherlands     Oct 2013 |
Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Australia Oct 2013 |
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |