Re: [xsl] Only child test

Subject: Re: [xsl] Only child test
From: Вячеслав Седов <schematronic@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:42:01 +0400

can be test="../*[2]" faster?

2013/10/10 Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> count(../* gt 1)
>
> or if you know that you're processing all siblings at the time,
>
> last() gt 1
>
> Michael Kay
> Saxonica
>
>
> On 10 Oct 2013, at 05:38, Karl Stubsjoen wrote:
>
>> Just curious how other's might approach a test to determine if the
>> current node is *not* an only child. This works fine but it feels a
>> little heavy to me.  Thoughts?
>>
>>                <xsl:if test="(count(preceding-sibling::*) +
>> count(following-sibling::*)) &gt; 1">
>>                    <hr/>
>>                </xsl:if>

Current Thread
[xsl] Only child test Karl Stubsjoen - 10 Oct 2013 04:39:12 -0000 Message not available G. Ken Holman - 10 Oct 2013 04:45:17 -0000 Michael Kay - 10 Oct 2013 06:34:00 -0000 Вячеслав Седов - 10 Oct 2013 08:42:12 -0000 <= David Carlisle - 10 Oct 2013 08:49:48 -0000 Michael Kay - 10 Oct 2013 09:02:24 -0000 G. Ken Holman - 10 Oct 2013 14:02:44 -0000 Peter West - 11 Oct 2013 00:22:20 -0000

Current Thread

[xsl] Only child test
- Karl Stubsjoen - 10 Oct 2013 04:39:12 -0000
  - Message not available
    - G. Ken Holman - 10 Oct 2013 04:45:17 -0000
  - Michael Kay - 10 Oct 2013 06:34:00 -0000
    - Вячеслав Седов - 10 Oct 2013 08:42:12 -0000 <=
      - David Carlisle - 10 Oct 2013 08:49:48 -0000
      - Michael Kay - 10 Oct 2013 09:02:24 -0000
      - G. Ken Holman - 10 Oct 2013 14:02:44 -0000
      - Peter West - 11 Oct 2013 00:22:20 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Only child test, Michael Kay	Thread	Re: [xsl] Only child test, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] Only child test, Michael Kay	Date	Re: [xsl] Only child test, David Carlisle
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home