Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0? From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 11:41:34 -0500 |
3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML documents.
Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the XSL-FO?
-- Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL & code list classes: Melbourne, AU May 2014 | Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training | Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm | Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ | G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about | Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Liam R E Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Tony Graham |
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Liam R E Quin | Date | [xsl] When will XSLT 3.0 progress t, Costello, Roger L. |
Month |