Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0? From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@xxxxxx> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:05:28 +0000 |
On 02/11/13 07:23, Toshihiko Makita wrote: [...]
3. I beleive that XSL-FO is most suitable techinology for formatting XML documents. Does CSS techinology become the complete alternative of the XSL-FO?
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Peter West | Thread | Re: [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Kevin Brown |
Re: [xsl] [xsl] xsl 2.0?, Wayne Brissette | Date | Re: [xsl] Data science, data analyt, Wendell Piez |
Month |