Re: [xsl] xsl:include

[Nic Gibson <nicg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah, yes

Thanks Tony

cheers

nic

On 13 Nov 2013, at 11:19, Tony Graham <tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, November 13, 2013 9:28 am, Nic Gibson wrote:
>> Ive just been asked a question that Im having trouble answering.
>> The question was could you give me a scenario where xsl:include is a
>> better choice than xsl:import? I cant think of one right now. Anyone got
>> a good example?
>
> When you don't want import precedence doing its thing, e.g., when the
> other module works around potential template rule conflicts by using
> @priority, if you import the other module, then templates in the current
> module won't play nicely with the finely graduated @priority values in the
> other module.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Tony Graham                                   tgraham@xxxxxxxxxx
> Consultant                                 http://www.mentea.net
> Mentea       13 Kelly's Bay Beach, Skerries, Co. Dublin, Ireland
> --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --  --
>    XML, XSL-FO and XSLT consulting, training and programming
>       Chair, Print and Page Layout Community Group @ W3C
>

--
Corbas Consulting / @CorbasLtd
Digital Publishing Consultancy and Training
http://www.corbas.co.uk, +44 (0)7718 906817/+44 (0)1273 930765