Subject: Re: [xsl] Design of XML so that it may be efficiently stream-processed From: Hank Ratzesberger <xml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:52:11 -0800 |
Hi Tim, On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Timothy W. Cook <tim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] > Self-contained sounds good. However, since an XML document can point > to another document, such as a schema. Doesn't it make sense that the > syntactic and semantic parameters are defined in one place? I am > "assuming" that there are many, many data files created from one > instrument, sensitivity/scale, geo-location, etc. ??? Yes. I attempted to do this by using an an eXist XML database http://exist-db.org/exist/apps/homepage/index.html as collections of XML documents. After leaving my work with the seismologist, he complained "why aren't we using MySQL and JQuery?" So that application isn't running any longer for me to show you, but you were able get to any one of them via their url, or use XQuery (a mistake ridden example, but something like) http://my.org/data/events/2010/030/station-name-uid.xml http://my.org/data/events[date > 2010-03-01][date < 2010-03-31][station=nameof] http://my.org/data?query=for $x in collection(/db/events)//event[date > 2013-11-01] return $x so, with some url rewriting or allowing reserved characters, the whole repository was online with an XPath or XQuery interface. It seemed like a good pairing of REST, "Good URL's", and XML. My attempt to make the "one place" a permanent url. --Hank
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Design of XML so that it , Timothy W. Cook | Thread | Re: [xsl] Design of XML so that it , Richard Fozzard - NO |
Re: [xsl] Design of XML so that it , Timothy W. Cook | Date | Re: [xsl] Design of XML so that it , Richard Fozzard - NO |
Month |