Subject: Re: [xsl] Does XSLT have a run-time system? From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:00:02 +0100 |
On 26/12/2013, James Fuller <james.fuller.2007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > case in point, DBase from the 1980's had a developer and runtime > license ... the cost of the runtime license was a lot lower but you > would need volume, the developer license was quite expensive. In this > instance, the RTS served as a 'dongle' to charge more money. I suspect > the emergence of open source licensing has helped diminish artificial > licensing practices but have no data to back up that statement. > DBase III was around as early as 1975, and IIRC, the runtime license permitted to many end users to run programs developed by a single developer with the costly license, something that was not considered unreasonably then. -W
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does XSLT have a run-time, James Fuller | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does XSLT have a run-time, James Fuller |
Re: [xsl] Does XSLT have a run-time, James Fuller | Date | Re: [xsl] Does XSLT have a run-time, James Fuller |
Month |