xsl-list /at/ lists.mulberrytech.com
Date Index

• Thread Index
• Month Index

• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Graydon - 1 Feb 2014 00:11:13 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 21:31:22 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 21:24:28 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 21:22:34 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 21:04:46 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 21:00:21 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 20:51:44 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 20:50:21 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 20:41:34 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 20:36:59 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 20:17:22 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 19:53:59 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 19:35:46 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 19:35:11 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 19:29:06 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 17:59:40 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 17:36:50 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Eliot Kimber - 31 Jan 2014 17:21:01 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 17:16:13 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Re: [saxon] template match dependent on parent, Wendell Piez - 31 Jan 2014 16:48:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Peter Flynn - 31 Jan 2014 12:28:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Context node versus current streaming position, Michael Kay - 31 Jan 2014 10:44:14 -0000
  
• [xsl] Context node versus current streaming position, Costello, Roger L. - 31 Jan 2014 10:34:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 07:22:51 -0000
  
• [xsl] Re: [saxon] template match dependent on parent, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 04:41:36 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 03:01:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 02:40:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 02:14:16 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 02:02:41 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 31 Jan 2014 01:57:58 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 01:54:13 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 01:09:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 01:03:55 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 31 Jan 2014 00:52:13 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 00:50:01 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 31 Jan 2014 00:46:26 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Graydon - 31 Jan 2014 00:45:58 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev - 31 Jan 2014 00:39:19 -0000
  
• [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka - 31 Jan 2014 00:19:18 -0000
  
• [xsl] [ANN] HTML5 and XML: a symposium, Tommie Usdin - 30 Jan 2014 18:00:42 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Thanks for <xsl:iterate>, Michael Kay - 30 Jan 2014 17:59:14 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Michael Kay - 30 Jan 2014 11:10:01 -0000
  
• RE: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Costello, Roger L. - 30 Jan 2014 10:37:39 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Michael Kay - 29 Jan 2014 11:50:38 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Michael Kay - 29 Jan 2014 11:31:27 -0000
  
• RE: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Costello, Roger L. - 29 Jan 2014 10:38:48 -0000
  
• [xsl] Thanks for <xsl:iterate>, David Sewell - 28 Jan 2014 22:18:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Andrew Welch - 28 Jan 2014 17:10:48 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Michael Kay - 28 Jan 2014 17:05:16 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, David Carlisle - 28 Jan 2014 16:53:14 -0000
  
• RE: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Lizzi, Vincent - 28 Jan 2014 16:30:58 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Wendell Piez - 28 Jan 2014 14:41:15 -0000
  
• [xsl] [ANN] Release of Xmplify 1.4.0, Damian Morris - 28 Jan 2014 10:21:04 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Graydon - 27 Jan 2014 23:56:10 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Martin Holmes - 27 Jan 2014 23:35:54 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, David Carlisle - 27 Jan 2014 23:33:29 -0000
  
• [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Piotr Fusik - 27 Jan 2014 23:26:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) - 25 Jan 2014 16:28:38 -0000
  
• [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Costello, Roger L. - 24 Jan 2014 10:15:52 -0000
  
• [xsl] Re: [xquery-talk] A Poor Man's XPROC, Ihe Onwuka - 23 Jan 2014 22:24:50 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Michael Kay - 23 Jan 2014 16:19:19 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Terry Badger - 23 Jan 2014 13:30:12 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Martin Honnen - 23 Jan 2014 11:54:34 -0000
  
• [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Pankaj Chaturvedi - 23 Jan 2014 11:43:38 -0000
  
• [xsl] A Poor Man's XPROC, Ihe Onwuka - 22 Jan 2014 16:13:06 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Grounded, Michael Kay - 21 Jan 2014 11:40:24 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Grounded, Costello, Roger L. - 21 Jan 2014 10:24:33 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Grounded, Michael Kay - 20 Jan 2014 12:08:07 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Grounded, David Carlisle - 20 Jan 2014 10:50:05 -0000
  
• [xsl] Streaming terminology: Grounded, Costello, Roger L. - 20 Jan 2014 10:38:25 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 16 Jan 2014 19:35:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez - 16 Jan 2014 19:31:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 16 Jan 2014 16:58:00 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun - 16 Jan 2014 16:23:31 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 16 Jan 2014 16:21:06 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez - 16 Jan 2014 15:31:26 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle - 16 Jan 2014 11:44:32 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. - 16 Jan 2014 10:39:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov - 15 Jan 2014 20:18:09 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez - 15 Jan 2014 15:56:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 15 Jan 2014 15:12:54 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 15 Jan 2014 11:27:17 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle - 15 Jan 2014 11:21:06 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle - 15 Jan 2014 11:17:10 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. - 15 Jan 2014 10:48:44 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep - 15 Jan 2014 09:44:57 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 15 Jan 2014 08:28:26 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Graydon - 15 Jan 2014 07:44:48 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep - 15 Jan 2014 07:28:51 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun - 15 Jan 2014 07:07:03 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 22:58:25 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov - 14 Jan 2014 22:44:39 -0000
  
• [xsl] What?s next for the Print and Page Layout Community Grou p?, Tony Graham - 14 Jan 2014 22:25:08 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 22:23:59 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 22:08:56 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański - 14 Jan 2014 21:49:37 -0000
  
• RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 21:21:11 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 20:34:41 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov - 14 Jan 2014 20:24:04 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 20:11:57 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov - 14 Jan 2014 20:01:50 -0000
  
• [xsl] Balisage 2014 Call for Participation, Tommie Usdin - 14 Jan 2014 17:35:58 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 16:45:13 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 14 Jan 2014 15:42:34 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez - 14 Jan 2014 15:24:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 14 Jan 2014 14:51:27 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 14 Jan 2014 12:26:19 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Peter West - 14 Jan 2014 11:59:28 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, John Lumley - 14 Jan 2014 10:43:45 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, John Lumley - 14 Jan 2014 10:30:33 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. - 14 Jan 2014 10:11:13 -0000
  
• [no subject], Unknown - Tue Jan 14 00:25:09 2014
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, John Lumley - 13 Jan 2014 18:19:23 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 13 Jan 2014 15:16:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun - 13 Jan 2014 15:07:59 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 13 Jan 2014 12:53:35 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun - 13 Jan 2014 12:43:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 13 Jan 2014 12:14:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] RE: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun - 13 Jan 2014 12:00:12 -0000
  
• [xsl] RE: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. - 13 Jan 2014 10:36:31 -0000
  
• RE: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Lizzi, Vincent - 13 Jan 2014 01:42:52 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 13 Jan 2014 00:24:21 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Mark Giffin - 13 Jan 2014 00:22:52 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 23:36:32 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 21:38:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 21:35:44 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Andrew Welch - 12 Jan 2014 21:11:32 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez - 12 Jan 2014 20:58:27 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay - 12 Jan 2014 19:28:08 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev - 12 Jan 2014 17:00:36 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle - 12 Jan 2014 13:28:10 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Andrew Welch - 12 Jan 2014 11:34:57 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle - 12 Jan 2014 11:19:26 -0000
  
• [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. - 12 Jan 2014 11:10:22 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka - 12 Jan 2014 06:34:44 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Wendell Piez - 11 Jan 2014 21:12:05 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, John Lumley - 11 Jan 2014 14:09:29 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 10 Jan 2014 22:18:31 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Liam R E Quin - 10 Jan 2014 22:17:53 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber - 10 Jan 2014 22:11:04 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 10 Jan 2014 22:03:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber - 10 Jan 2014 20:56:04 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber - 10 Jan 2014 19:00:12 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, David Carlisle - 10 Jan 2014 17:33:08 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Michael Kay - 10 Jan 2014 17:27:19 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Wendell Piez - 10 Jan 2014 17:21:24 -0000
  
• [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber - 10 Jan 2014 17:06:17 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 10 Jan 2014 16:39:57 -0000
  
• RE: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 10 Jan 2014 16:33:52 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Wendell Piez - 10 Jan 2014 15:03:33 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay - 10 Jan 2014 14:37:38 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, davep - 10 Jan 2014 14:11:04 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka - 10 Jan 2014 12:57:33 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 10 Jan 2014 12:49:21 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, David Carlisle - 10 Jan 2014 12:43:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay - 10 Jan 2014 12:01:36 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Andrew Welch - 10 Jan 2014 11:01:36 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 10 Jan 2014 10:56:22 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka - 10 Jan 2014 10:31:30 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, David Carlisle - 10 Jan 2014 10:28:58 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka - 10 Jan 2014 08:22:09 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Michael Kay - 10 Jan 2014 08:16:35 -0000
  
• [xsl] New pricing for XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Australia, G. Ken Holman - 10 Jan 2014 03:59:12 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Martin Holmes - 10 Jan 2014 01:49:06 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Graydon - 10 Jan 2014 01:12:11 -0000
  
• [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Mark Giffin - 10 Jan 2014 00:53:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Including node in group when grouping key is null, Wendell Piez - 9 Jan 2014 17:11:00 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay - 9 Jan 2014 11:21:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Tony Graham - 9 Jan 2014 11:14:10 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay - 9 Jan 2014 11:13:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Andrew Welch - 9 Jan 2014 11:07:35 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 9 Jan 2014 10:52:02 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 9 Jan 2014 10:49:05 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Martin Honnen - 9 Jan 2014 10:44:51 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 9 Jan 2014 10:36:59 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Including node in group when grouping key is null, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex - 9 Jan 2014 07:16:51 -0000
  
• [xsl] Including node in group when grouping key is null, Steve Fogel - 9 Jan 2014 07:12:10 -0000
  
• [xsl] Classes in XML, XSLT/XPath, Advanced XSLT, Schematron, Tommie Usdin - 8 Jan 2014 19:07:53 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 8 Jan 2014 13:06:38 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 8 Jan 2014 12:59:01 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay - 8 Jan 2014 12:53:51 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 8 Jan 2014 12:51:35 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 8 Jan 2014 12:40:49 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay - 8 Jan 2014 11:54:43 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 8 Jan 2014 11:54:35 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 8 Jan 2014 11:41:48 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Tony Graham - 8 Jan 2014 11:20:47 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 8 Jan 2014 11:05:03 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle - 8 Jan 2014 10:58:44 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Tony Graham - 8 Jan 2014 10:49:08 -0000
  
• [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L. - 8 Jan 2014 10:33:57 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Vasu Chakkera - 8 Jan 2014 01:23:11 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Graydon - 7 Jan 2014 19:49:06 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, a kusa - 7 Jan 2014 19:43:22 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Graydon - 7 Jan 2014 19:38:38 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Martin Holmes - 7 Jan 2014 19:29:17 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Graydon - 7 Jan 2014 19:26:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Martin Holmes - 7 Jan 2014 19:13:43 -0000
  
• [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, a kusa - 7 Jan 2014 19:09:14 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev - 6 Jan 2014 03:35:17 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Liam R E Quin - 6 Jan 2014 02:49:25 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev - 6 Jan 2014 02:34:22 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev - 6 Jan 2014 02:27:33 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Liam R E Quin - 6 Jan 2014 02:27:24 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay - 5 Jan 2014 23:42:35 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev - 5 Jan 2014 21:52:38 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay - 5 Jan 2014 21:51:47 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay - 5 Jan 2014 21:16:29 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Costello, Roger L. - 5 Jan 2014 21:16:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Saxon/C going forward, Jirka Kosek - 5 Jan 2014 21:14:56 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay - 5 Jan 2014 21:04:07 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Costello, Roger L. - 5 Jan 2014 18:09:07 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev - 5 Jan 2014 17:23:12 -0000
  
• [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Costello, Roger L. - 5 Jan 2014 10:24:18 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] convert excel date to valid date format, henry human - 3 Jan 2014 20:54:23 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] convert excel date to valid date format, Wolfgang Laun - 3 Jan 2014 15:18:59 -0000
  
• [xsl] convert excel date to valid date format, henry human - 3 Jan 2014 13:54:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0?, Tony Graham - 3 Jan 2014 12:59:37 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0?, Michael Kay - 3 Jan 2014 12:46:42 -0000
  
• [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0?, Tony Graham - 3 Jan 2014 12:09:02 -0000
  
• [xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin - 1 Jan 2014 16:48:21 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Flynn, Peter - 1 Jan 2014 16:18:15 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Adam Retter - 1 Jan 2014 12:41:56 -0000
  
• Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Alexander Johannesen - 1 Jan 2014 10:16:05 -0000
  
• [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Michael Kay - 1 Jan 2014 09:34:35 -0000