Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree? From: Piotr Bański <bansp@xxxxx> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:23:44 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Piotr BaEski <bansp@xxxxx> wrote:But to speak of a node nested inside another... urgle. Sounds wrongish.
Yes, if we speak about *trees*
However, with *streaming* the string representation of a descendant node (and of whole subtrees) is actually, physically nested in the string representation of the root of the tree (it is *physically* between the start-tag and the end-tag of the root element).
As we are struggling to understand streaming better, it is good to use terminology that is best reflecting the actual streaming -- thus "nested" is a precise reflection of the real, physical nesting during streaming.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Costello, Roger L. |
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | [xsl] What?s next for the Print a, Tony Graham |
Month |