Subject: Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 07:12:21 -0800 |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm perfectly comfortable with a replacement such as "... that no title element will ever contain another I think this is good. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep. ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they write all patents, too? :) ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, davep | Thread | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Imsieke, Gerrit, le- | Date | Re: [xsl] Does the count() function, Wendell Piez |
Month |