Subject: Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple From: Graydon <graydon@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 16:20:02 -0500 |
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 09:06:56PM +0000, David Carlisle scripsit: > On 01/02/2014 00:11, Graydon wrote: > >I still want a better syntax for using negated except in predicates, > >such as: > > > >div[not(* except (heading,para))] > > div[every $e in * satisfies $e/(self::heading or self::para)] That's equivalent, it's conceptually clearer if people are comfortable with slash-sequence, but I'm not sure it's clearer as a syntactical expression. I think I mostly want something like div[only(heading,para)] but that raises the question of what only() would do with comments and processing instructions. (And yes, I could perfectly well write a local:only().) -- Graydon
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates shou, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates shou, Ihe Onwuka |
Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates shou, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates shou, Graydon |
Month |