Subject: Re: [xsl] Semantics of "match" From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:37:34 +0000 |
On 3 Feb 2014, at 14:58, Wendell Piez <wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Graydon <graydon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 3.0 allows more axis references in template matches than 2.0 did; 2.0 is >> child and attribute only, 3.0 allows descendant. (I think it allows all >> ForwardAxis axises.) >> >> So >> >> <xsl:template match="descendant::*"/> >> >> is a legal match attribute value. >> >> Leaving any use of except or intersect or union out of it for now just >> what does that match mean? descendant::* matches any element that is a descendant of anything. Which is not very useful. But section/descendant::text()[1] matches the first descendant text node of a section element, which starts to look quite handy. > > > If this holds for 3.0 (and mind you it doesn't, quite), then > match="following-sibling::li" would match every 'li' in your document > except first children of their respective parents. > We're not allowing the sibling axes in patterns, only the complete set of downward axes. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[xsl] Semantics of "match", Wendell Piez | Thread | [xsl] XSL:FO approach for facing-pa, Martin Holmes |
Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Ihe Onwuka | Date | Re: [xsl] except (was: Keys with du, Andrew Welch |
Month |