Re: [xsl] Escaped canonical XML?

[Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm sure that most people on this list, like me, answer a question if they
know the answer, and keep silent if they don't.

It's rare for a question to go unanswered, but this is a little
specialised...

Michael Kay
Saxonica

On 27 Feb 2014, at 12:42, Martynas JuseviD
ius <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hey again. Did my email got lost or has nobody come across a similar
> problem? Maybe I'm using a wrong approach?
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Martynas JuseviD
ius
> <martynas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I have a stylesheet that transforms TEI to TriX, which is currently
>> the only (and non-standard) XML serialization for RDF datasets with
>> named graphs [1].
>>
>> The issue is that TriX format expects escaped XML literals, while RDF
>> data model expects canonical XML literals. How do I produce a
>> combination of both?
>>
>> Currently I'm using xml-to-string by Evan Lenz [2] to escape the XML
>> literals. I wonder if it can be modified to produce a canonical
>> version as well? There is $use-empty-syntax parameter that might help,
>> but there are many more rules in canonicalization, as far as I know.
>>
>> Suggestions appreciated.
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/
>> [2] http://lenzconsulting.com/xml-to-string/
>>
>> Martynas
>> graphityhq.com