Subject: Re: [xsl] Streaming with XSLT version 3.0 From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 16:06:05 +0000 |
On 11 Mar 2014, at 15:12, David Rudel <fwqhgads@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Radu, > Regarding your "In conclusion" paragraph, is this for the > transformation under discussion, or are you speaking more generally? > The reason I ask is that at one time oXygen's default behavior was to > disable byte-code generation. If that is still the case, wouldn't a > use also need to enable byte-code generation in order to get similar > performance? > > I use oXygen and typically load a completely empty configuration file > as a "custom" config. This typically makes my scripts run about twice > as quickly compared to default oXygen behavior owing to the generation > of byte-code. > -David Interesting. I would have assumed that for many oXygen scenarios, the extra compile-time cost of generating bytecode didn't justify the run-time benefits; but that's in the absence of any measurements. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Streaming with XSLT versi, David Rudel | Thread | Re: [xsl] Streaming with XSLT versi, David Rudel |
Re: [xsl] Streaming with XSLT versi, David Rudel | Date | Re: [xsl] Streaming with XSLT versi, David Rudel |
Month |